Showing posts with label Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Media. Show all posts

Monday, 14 October 2013

Money or exposure?

What are your skills worth?  The answer to this question very much depends on whom you ask.  Looking at the cost of tertiary education you would certainly place a very high value on education and skill.  However, when you look at a new trend in the workplace, it seems that education, skills and experience have lost their monetary value.

I am referring to the alarming rate of jobs being advertised with no (yes NO) form of remuneration.  What I find utterly ridiculous though is that these arrogant companies have a long list of requirements for the "successful" candidate in terms of experience and education.

It is often encountered when you try to break into a new industry.  You might be expected to work for an extended amount of time in order for the employer to see if you are a good fit or for you to get to know the business.  Well maybe I have just reached that certain age where I am no longer bedazzled by big words and fancy promises, but in my book this is just plain wrong.  If my skills are deemed good enough to do actual work, I need to be paid in actual dollars.

Media Watch exposed that professional photographers are facing this very same problem.  Tennis Australia tried to lure experienced photographers to cover a tournament in Melbourne as volunteers.

A key requirement of this role is that you own your own camera and equipment and have a portfolio of work, especially action shots that can be submitted with your application.
— seek.com.au, 6th September, 2013

So what would this photographer using his/her own equipment, skills and time get by committing?  Well exposure of course!

This seems to be new buzz word - you work for free in order to gain valuable exposure.  It is a well known fact that media is struggling to come to terms with all the changes caused by technology.  However, expecting professionals to work for free or sourcing information and pictures from bystanders are surely not the answer.

Social Media already provides us with all the exposure we desire, what we need is for our work to be acknowledged, valued and paid for.  If you feel as strongly as I do about this, please show your support by joining https://www.facebook.com/fairgoforphotographers

Monday, 5 August 2013

No evidence of journalistic principles



The Australian federal election has been called for the 7th of September 2013.  I think it is fair to say that most people have expected the newspapers to dig up dirt on the candidates to use as sensationalized headlines.

However, The Daily Telegraph sunk to a new low with this front page:
Of course no article can be 100% subjective, but at least most journalists aim to represent multiple sides to an argument.  That is journalists not working for News Corp.  Paul Sheehan wrote an insightful article explaining the reasoning behind this front page.  As we all know News Corp is owned by Rupert Murdoch - a man fighting to keep his news empire turning over a handsome profit.  And this is precisely here where the problem lies ...

Newspaper circulation has been in decline worldwide for quite some time.  In addition to that, Murdoch also faces a threat to his Foxtel cable TV monopoly in Australia.  This threat is in the form of Labor's National Broadband Network.

In Mr Murdoch's own words this is about business.  My opinion is that you are going about it in the wrong way Mr Murdoch - you are mixing mediums that should operate independently and in doing so you might bring about your downfall.

You have proven that you are quite willing to use unethical and even unlawful tactics to gain a scoop.  Does it then come as a shock that people are angered by your (once again) misuse of power in a blatant attempt to influence the Australian public?  What angers people even more is that you are doing it purely for your own self interest.  The rich dictating to the masses in order to enrich themselves further.

People are no longer solely depended on newspapers to be informed, there are countless (free) sources online that provide a multitude of views and insights into all kinds of issues.  Also, even without the NBN people are streaming their entertainment through the internet.  To me this looks like the desperate actions of a desperate man - a man who has not figured out how to change with the times and therefore finds his empire dwindling.

  

Monday, 29 July 2013

Media failing its duty as 4th estate

There is no other way to start this blog than in the traditional fairy tale manner of once upon a time

Once upon a time the media could be relied upon to ensure the health of democracy.

Once upon a time the media supplied unbiased information to citizens in order for them to make responsible, informed choices.

But those days are long gone.  Media has fallen under the spell of the spectacle.  If the truth no longer sells papers or lead to website hits, then a spectacle surely will.  More emphasis is placed on sensationalizing the news than on securing accuracy.

Mass media still influences the public's point of view.  Yet, even though we are aware of the manipulating ways of the media, we are quite often still fooled into thinking we know the real story, when in fact we have been deceived.